<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Shooting the eyes of bad men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrbowers.net/blog</link>
	<description>Movies, writing, and other stuff I like</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast! GUESS WHO&#8217;S COMING TO DINNER and THE HELP! by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=160#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=160#comment-242</guid>
		<description>FUCK YOU, MOVIE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FUCK YOU, MOVIE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast! GUESS WHO&#8217;S COMING TO DINNER and THE HELP! by Alli</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=160#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Alli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=160#comment-241</guid>
		<description>I seriously nearly did a spit take when Matthew said there was a voice over.  

Sounds like some really mixed feelings about THE HELP, which means I will probably skip it in theaters.  I &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; be moving GUESS WHO&#039;S COMING TO DINNER up the to-watch list, though. 

I&#039;m so looking forward to the silliness of next week and I find it tragic that Kati won&#039;t be joining us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously nearly did a spit take when Matthew said there was a voice over.  </p>
<p>Sounds like some really mixed feelings about THE HELP, which means I will probably skip it in theaters.  I <i>will</i> be moving GUESS WHO&#8217;S COMING TO DINNER up the to-watch list, though. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m so looking forward to the silliness of next week and I find it tragic that Kati won&#8217;t be joining us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast episode 13: THE TREE OF LIFE and THE FOUNTAIN by LadyG</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=148#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>LadyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=148#comment-196</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The Big Sleep&lt;/em&gt; is the movie where Hammett didn&#039;t reveal who the culprit was! &lt;em&gt;Maltese Falcon&lt;/em&gt; is linear by contrast. (And IMO, you copy that so you can send people running around chasing after it, while your Falcon is safe at home. Also IMO, he gave Brigid up because she played him.)

All Humphrey Bogart movies are awesome, pretty much. I recommend &lt;em&gt;Key Largo&lt;/em&gt; next.

So glad you talked about &lt;em&gt;The Fountain!&lt;/em&gt; I love it too. YOU&#039;RE BOTH TOTALLY RIGHT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Big Sleep</em> is the movie where Hammett didn&#8217;t reveal who the culprit was! <em>Maltese Falcon</em> is linear by contrast. (And IMO, you copy that so you can send people running around chasing after it, while your Falcon is safe at home. Also IMO, he gave Brigid up because she played him.)</p>
<p>All Humphrey Bogart movies are awesome, pretty much. I recommend <em>Key Largo</em> next.</p>
<p>So glad you talked about <em>The Fountain!</em> I love it too. YOU&#8217;RE BOTH TOTALLY RIGHT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wrong Opinions About Movies, episode 7: PIRATES by Alli</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=114#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Alli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 15:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=114#comment-156</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right, Matthew!  Why &lt;i&gt;aren&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; you watching Hitchcock right now???

(And you&#039;re correct, I &lt;strong&gt;am&lt;/strong&gt; planning to watch Alcatraz, so we&#039;ll see how it turns out.)

Excellent episode sans me, you guys.  I&#039;d taken Captain Blood out of my Netflix queue after I knew I wouldn&#039;t make it this week, but I think I&#039;m putting it back in!  (Also, I agree that Matthew needs to keep up his &quot;Pirate&quot; voice at all times.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, Matthew!  Why <i>aren&#8217;t</i> you watching Hitchcock right now???</p>
<p>(And you&#8217;re correct, I <strong>am</strong> planning to watch Alcatraz, so we&#8217;ll see how it turns out.)</p>
<p>Excellent episode sans me, you guys.  I&#8217;d taken Captain Blood out of my Netflix queue after I knew I wouldn&#8217;t make it this week, but I think I&#8217;m putting it back in!  (Also, I agree that Matthew needs to keep up his &#8220;Pirate&#8221; voice at all times.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PODCAST!!! Wrong Opinions About Movies, episode one by jessecoombs</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=89#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>jessecoombs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=89#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Is this going to be on itunes soon? I couldn&#039;t set up a subscription with itunes and the RSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this going to be on itunes soon? I couldn&#8217;t set up a subscription with itunes and the RSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why THE KING&#8217;S SPEECH shouldn&#8217;t have been anywhere near the Kodak Theatre by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=55#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=55#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t have a problem with the fact that the filmmaking wasn&#039;t particularly &quot;fancy;&quot; as I said, it was quite competent. Nothing particularly strong about it, though, which is why I have a problem with it winning Best Director and Best Picture. Direction doesn&#039;t need to be fancy or whatnot in order to impress me, just strong. Spielberg&#039;s direction of &lt;i&gt;Schindler&#039;s List&lt;/i&gt;, or Mendes&#039;s of &lt;i&gt;American Beauty&lt;/i&gt;, weren&#039;t the least bit fancy, yet I still feel those Best Director statues were well-earned.

I seem to have gotten across the exact opposite point I was attempting to make, because it sounds like you think I didn&#039;t like the film because it didn&#039;t have enough flash or glitter. Not so. My problem with the film was that it didn&#039;t have anything to say. You say it was a good story, but I disagree, because I still don&#039;t know what that story was about. Nor do I have any problem with quiet, understated films -- I would have been surprised had &lt;i&gt;The Kids Are All Right&lt;/i&gt; won, but pleased.

As for &lt;i&gt;Inception&lt;/i&gt;, I&#039;d agree that it doesn&#039;t have the most well-developed characters in the history of film, but I&#039;d prefer that to being force-fed information about characters the way we are in &lt;i&gt;The King&#039;s Speech&lt;/i&gt;. Show, don&#039;t tell. As for the rest, well, the main motivation of the lead character is to get back to his children, not make a lot of money. Indeed, he promises his share of the money to Dileep Rao&#039;s character. I&#039;d also argue that it&#039;s more than simply two and a half hours of &quot;one clever thought&quot;; it&#039;s an extremely well-executed and entertaining heist film with an interesting twist to the circumstances. Do I think it was The Best Movie Of The Year? No, of the films nominated I would have prefered &lt;i&gt;The Social Network&lt;/i&gt; or even &lt;i&gt;Black Swan&lt;/i&gt; win before &lt;i&gt;Inception&lt;/i&gt;. I do think it deserved to win Best Original Screenplay, and I remain appalled that Christopher Nolan wasn&#039;t nominated for Best Director -- not because of any flash or glitter, but simply on the strength of his ability to tell a compelling story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t have a problem with the fact that the filmmaking wasn&#8217;t particularly &#8220;fancy;&#8221; as I said, it was quite competent. Nothing particularly strong about it, though, which is why I have a problem with it winning Best Director and Best Picture. Direction doesn&#8217;t need to be fancy or whatnot in order to impress me, just strong. Spielberg&#8217;s direction of <i>Schindler&#8217;s List</i>, or Mendes&#8217;s of <i>American Beauty</i>, weren&#8217;t the least bit fancy, yet I still feel those Best Director statues were well-earned.</p>
<p>I seem to have gotten across the exact opposite point I was attempting to make, because it sounds like you think I didn&#8217;t like the film because it didn&#8217;t have enough flash or glitter. Not so. My problem with the film was that it didn&#8217;t have anything to say. You say it was a good story, but I disagree, because I still don&#8217;t know what that story was about. Nor do I have any problem with quiet, understated films &#8212; I would have been surprised had <i>The Kids Are All Right</i> won, but pleased.</p>
<p>As for <i>Inception</i>, I&#8217;d agree that it doesn&#8217;t have the most well-developed characters in the history of film, but I&#8217;d prefer that to being force-fed information about characters the way we are in <i>The King&#8217;s Speech</i>. Show, don&#8217;t tell. As for the rest, well, the main motivation of the lead character is to get back to his children, not make a lot of money. Indeed, he promises his share of the money to Dileep Rao&#8217;s character. I&#8217;d also argue that it&#8217;s more than simply two and a half hours of &#8220;one clever thought&#8221;; it&#8217;s an extremely well-executed and entertaining heist film with an interesting twist to the circumstances. Do I think it was The Best Movie Of The Year? No, of the films nominated I would have prefered <i>The Social Network</i> or even <i>Black Swan</i> win before <i>Inception</i>. I do think it deserved to win Best Original Screenplay, and I remain appalled that Christopher Nolan wasn&#8217;t nominated for Best Director &#8212; not because of any flash or glitter, but simply on the strength of his ability to tell a compelling story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why THE KING&#8217;S SPEECH shouldn&#8217;t have been anywhere near the Kodak Theatre by Joni</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=55#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Joni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=55#comment-54</guid>
		<description>So, uh, I actually thought &lt;i&gt;The King&#039;s Speech&lt;/i&gt; was phenomenal. Not my favorite -- I really, really loved &lt;i&gt;The Kids Are All Right&lt;/i&gt; -- but I think a lot of the things I liked, the things that I thought made it stand out as a movie, were the things you didn&#039;t like. There didn&#039;t need to be vast and powerful metaphors at work, or shiny new editing techniques, because a good story, well-acted and well-executed, shouldn&#039;t need gimmicks. It&#039;s rare to see that kind of storytelling honored in America, and I didn&#039;t mind at all that &lt;i&gt;The King&#039;s Speech&lt;/i&gt;won.

To be fair, the historical context is a large part of what won me over -- I didn&#039;t feel like it needed to be MORE dramatic, because we&#039;ve been deluged with a plethora of super-dramatic WWII movies over the years. So a quiet, understated film about a man with a stutter whose voice will become part of what carries his nation through prolonged, brutal attacks, well. I like that movie. I like that story. 

I&#039;m not sure any of the directions you wish they&#039;d taken it in would have made it a better film, to be honest. There&#039;s nothing about it I would have changed. Additionally, I thought the technical aspects were all very well done, if not particularly fancy. 

Quite frankly, I would have been appalled if &lt;i&gt;Inception&lt;/i&gt; had won anything other than technical awards. Two and a half hours of one clever thought, as performed by a panoply of poorly-developed characters, most of whom aren&#039;t remotely sympathetic, and we have no reason to care who lives or dies (assuming you believe any of it is real), because the motivation for most of the action depends on some guy&#039;s desire to make a lot of money. Big fricking deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, uh, I actually thought <i>The King&#8217;s Speech</i> was phenomenal. Not my favorite &#8212; I really, really loved <i>The Kids Are All Right</i> &#8212; but I think a lot of the things I liked, the things that I thought made it stand out as a movie, were the things you didn&#8217;t like. There didn&#8217;t need to be vast and powerful metaphors at work, or shiny new editing techniques, because a good story, well-acted and well-executed, shouldn&#8217;t need gimmicks. It&#8217;s rare to see that kind of storytelling honored in America, and I didn&#8217;t mind at all that <i>The King&#8217;s Speech</i>won.</p>
<p>To be fair, the historical context is a large part of what won me over &#8212; I didn&#8217;t feel like it needed to be MORE dramatic, because we&#8217;ve been deluged with a plethora of super-dramatic WWII movies over the years. So a quiet, understated film about a man with a stutter whose voice will become part of what carries his nation through prolonged, brutal attacks, well. I like that movie. I like that story. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure any of the directions you wish they&#8217;d taken it in would have made it a better film, to be honest. There&#8217;s nothing about it I would have changed. Additionally, I thought the technical aspects were all very well done, if not particularly fancy. </p>
<p>Quite frankly, I would have been appalled if <i>Inception</i> had won anything other than technical awards. Two and a half hours of one clever thought, as performed by a panoply of poorly-developed characters, most of whom aren&#8217;t remotely sympathetic, and we have no reason to care who lives or dies (assuming you believe any of it is real), because the motivation for most of the action depends on some guy&#8217;s desire to make a lot of money. Big fricking deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: BLACK SWAN (2010) by jessecoombs</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=40#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>jessecoombs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=40#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Good review! I liked reading this. I&#039;m very excited to read what you have to say about other Aronofsky films. The only one that I will warn you about is Requiem For a Dream. It&#039;s fantastic, but it will punch you in the soul repeatedly and without pause.

I&#039;m looking forward to watching Black Swan even more now. We have two prints of that running and I&#039;m constantly hearing the soundtrack and feedback from the crowds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review! I liked reading this. I&#8217;m very excited to read what you have to say about other Aronofsky films. The only one that I will warn you about is Requiem For a Dream. It&#8217;s fantastic, but it will punch you in the soul repeatedly and without pause.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to watching Black Swan even more now. We have two prints of that running and I&#8217;m constantly hearing the soundtrack and feedback from the crowds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: STAR TREK: VOYAGER &#8211; 1&#215;01: &#8220;Caretaker&#8221; by Nathalia</title>
		<link>http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=31#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrbowers.net/blog/?p=31#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I only watched select episodes of TNG and Voyager because those are the ones the boyfriend likes, so I can&#039;t compare it to DS9 or Enterprise, but I liked what I saw of Voyager. We had watched the TNG episodes he picked first (he doesn&#039;t believe in watching things from start to finish or in a chronological order but then again, it didn&#039;t always feel necessary in TNG) and then we watched the Voyager pilot and I liked the conflict. I didn&#039;t think that there would ever be a mutiny or something but at least there was conflict and not the TNG atmosphere that felt hollow and bland.

Then again, I never watched the whole season, just finales and sometimes a random episode here and there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only watched select episodes of TNG and Voyager because those are the ones the boyfriend likes, so I can&#8217;t compare it to DS9 or Enterprise, but I liked what I saw of Voyager. We had watched the TNG episodes he picked first (he doesn&#8217;t believe in watching things from start to finish or in a chronological order but then again, it didn&#8217;t always feel necessary in TNG) and then we watched the Voyager pilot and I liked the conflict. I didn&#8217;t think that there would ever be a mutiny or something but at least there was conflict and not the TNG atmosphere that felt hollow and bland.</p>
<p>Then again, I never watched the whole season, just finales and sometimes a random episode here and there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

